Cases 21 - 30 of 125
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2022cv05454
Plaintiff:
Sondra Sampson
Defendant:
Mattress Firm, Inc., DSI Logistics, LLC and Valery Mukhin
Debtor In Possession:
Dedicated Transportation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Inno-Sports Co., Ltd. v. Mattress Firm, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
Inno-Sports Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Mattress Firm, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Mattress Venture, LLC, The et al v. Power of One, LLC et al
as 9:2021cv03858
Plaintiff:
Mattress Venture, LLC, The, Mattress Venture, L.P., The and Mattress Firm Inc
Defendant:
Power of One, LLC, Bed World LLC and Adam Fazio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Southglenn Property Holdings, LLC v. Mattress Firm, Inc
as 1:2021cv01672
Defendant:
Mattress Firm, Inc a Delaware corporation doing business as Mattress King
Plaintiff:
Southglenn Property Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Southglenn Property Holdings, LLC v. Mattress Firm, Inc.
as 1:2021cv01654
Defendant:
Mattress Firm, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Southglenn Property Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Payero v. Mattress Firm, Inc.
as 7:2021cv03061
Defendant:
Mattress Firm, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Antonio Payero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr
Jimi RoseIn re: Jimi Rose
as 21-1637
Respondent:
BASHKIM HUSENAJ, HOFFMAN INSURANCE CONSULTANTS LLC, MIKE DOPKIN, Allentown Office and others
Petitioner:
In re: JIMI ROSE
Jimi Rose v. Mattress Firm Inc, et al
as 21-1560
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN ECK and MATTRESS FIRM INC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JIMI ROSE
MBK HOLDINGS LLC v. MATTRESS FIRM, INC. SUCCESSOR TO SLEEPY'S
as 2:2021cv04489
Defendant:
MATTRESS FIRM, INC. SUCCESSOR TO SLEEPY'S
Plaintiff:
MBK HOLDINGS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PERRONG v. MATTRESS FIRM, INC
as 2:2021cv00071
Defendant:
MATTRESS FIRM, INC
Plaintiff:
ANDREW PERRONG
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
