Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Kress v. Zoning Hearing Board of Sugarloaf Township et al
as 3:2023cv01389
Plaintiff:
Harry J. Kress, Jr.
Defendant:
Zoning Hearing Board of Sugarloaf Township, Timothy Mundie, George Maue and others
Not Classified By Court:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
SPENCER v. COURTIER et al
as 1:2009cv00124
Plaintiff:
RAVANNA SPENCER
Defendant:
LANCE COURTIER, JEFFERY A. BEARD, DONALD KELCHNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SMALL v. VISINSKY et al
as 3:2008cv00044
Plaintiff:
ELWOOD SMALL
Defendant:
JOSEPH W. VISINSKY, ANNETTE KOWALEWSKI and FRED MAUE, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ozoroski v. Beard et al
as 1:2008cv00082
Plaintiff:
Stanley N. Ozoroski
Defendant:
Jeffery A. Beard, Frederick R. Maue, John S Reidell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HANKINS v. BEARD et al
as 1:2007cv00332
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HANKINS
Defendant:
JEFFARY A. BEARD, WILLIAM STICKMAN, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. BEARD et al
as 2:2007cv01398
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY C. ALLEN
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, JOHN SHAFFER, FRED MAUE, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JACOBS et al v. BEARD et al
as 2:2007cv03540
Plaintiff:
ANDRE JACOBS, ABDUL BROWN, PURCELL BRONSON and others
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, JOHN SHAFFER, FRED MAUE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPENCER v. BEARD et al
as 1:2007cv00138
Plaintiff:
RAVANNA SPENCER
Defendant:
JEFFERY A. BEARD, DONALD KELCHER, DAVID PATTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. BEARD et al
as 2:2007cv00637
Plaintiff:
ABDUL BROWN
Defendant:
JEFFREY BEARD , WILLIAM STICKMAN , FRED MAUE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
