Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Concepcion v. Alves et al
as 1:2022cv11703
Petitioner:
Raymond Concepcion
Respondent:
Superintendent Nelson Alves and Attorney General Maura Healey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kyricopoulos v. Healey et al
as 1:2022cv10521
Petitioner:
James Peter Kyricopoulos
Respondent:
Attorney General Maura Healey and Marta Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tejada v. Alves et al
as 1:2021cv11509
Petitioner:
Jose Tejada
Respondent:
Nelson Alves and Maura Healey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Goparian v. Worcester Police Department et al
as 1:2021cv10545
Defendant:
Worcester Police Department, Joe Early, Terry McLaughlin and others
Respondent:
In those Supervised by Sergeant Richardson
Plaintiff:
Donovan Goparian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Kyricopoulos v. Mendoza et al
as 1:2020cv10393
Respondent:
Maura Healey and Marta Mendoza
Petitioner:
James Peter Kyricopoulos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Joseph v. Turco et al
as 1:2019cv11839
Defendant:
Department of Correction, Steven Silva, Maura Healey and others
Plaintiff:
Santony Joseph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ntale v. Healey et al
as 1:2019cv11046
Plaintiff:
Othuman Ntale and Prince
Defendant:
Sara Wayland Ellis, Maura Healey, Charlie Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woollam v. Cowen et al
as 1:2019cv10655
Plaintiff:
Derek Woollam
Respondent:
Superintendent Brad Cowen and Attorney General Maura Healey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ecker v. Goguen et al
as 3:2019cv10020
Respondent:
Colette Goguen, Maura Healey and Commonwealth of Massaschusetts
Petitioner:
John Ecker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lewis v. Demos et al
as 1:2018cv12322
Defendant:
Massachusetts State Police, George Demos, Margaret Morris and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Edward Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
