Cases 31 - 40 of 1,771
McKay v. LaCroix
as 23-30775
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Brandy McKay, Individually, and on behalf of her minor child, P.M.
Defendant / Appellant:
David LaCroix, Trooper and Rohn Bordelon, Sergeant
McKay v. RBM Partners LLC et al
as 4:2023cv01384
Plaintiff:
Keith McKay
Defendant:
RBM Partners LLC doing business as Chez Paree, Jason Hams and Sinetria Staples
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Lamar McKay v. Jeff Tanner
as 23-1928
Petitioner / Appellant:
LAMAR MCKAY
Respondent / Appellee:
JEFF TANNER, Warden
East v. Little et al
as 1:2023cv00450
Plaintiff:
Michael East
Defendant:
Brad Little, Idaho Board of Correction, Governing Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corning v. Little et al
as 1:2023cv00457
Plaintiff:
Seth Corning
Defendant:
Brad Little, Idaho Board of Correction, Governing Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blong v. Little et al
as 1:2023cv00459
Plaintiff:
David Blong
Defendant:
Brad Little, Idaho Board of Correction, Governing Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luera v. Little, et al.
as 1:2023cv00454
Plaintiff:
Severo Luera
Defendant:
Brad Little, Idaho Board of Correction, Governing Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oldenburg v. Little et al
as 1:2023cv00449
Plaintiff:
Nick Oldenburg
Defendant:
Brad Little, Idaho Board of Correction, Governing Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sutton v. Little, et al.
as 1:2023cv00456
Plaintiff:
Nick Sutton
Defendant:
Brad Little, Idaho Board of Correction, Governing Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv21094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
