Cases 1 - 10 of 1,006
Reaves et al v. Kyler et al
as 1:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves, Tiesha Danielle Evans and Dmitri A. Reaves
Defendant:
David Levert Kyler, Officer Sutton, County of Richmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Breyan v. Henry McMaster
as 24-6400
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BREYAN
Defendant:
HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER, Governor
Spann v. Gov; Henry McMaster et al
as 3:2024cv02345
Plaintiff:
Freddy Spann
Defendant:
Gov; Henry McMaster and Mental Health Der Clinic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dutschmann v. 84 Lumber Company, a limited partnership et al
as 3:2024cv01153
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Dutschmann
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company, a limited partnership, Ace Hardware Corporation, Advance Stores Company Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1701
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Goss v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 4:2024cv01032
Plaintiff:
Jamie Goss
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, China Wuhan Government, United State Joe Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Breyan v. Henry McMaster et al
as 2:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Breyan
Defendant:
Henry McMaster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cenk Uygur v. South Carolina Democratic Party
as 24-1052
Plaintiff:
CENK UYGUR and JOHN WARD
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA, HENRY MCMASTER, in his official capacity as Governor of South Carolina, ALAN WILSON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of South Carolina and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
