Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Walker et al v. McDonald's Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Terrence Walker and Amber Bishop
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation, City of Harrodsburg, Kentucky and J.D. Pal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Washington v. McDonald's USA, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00367
Plaintiff:
Herbert L. Washington
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation and McDonald's USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Snedecor v. City of Livonia et al
as 2:2020cv10853
Defendant:
Manager Erin unknown, LT. Pesh, Joenetta Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Evan Snedecor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00002
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00322
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nigel Reid, II v. McDonalds Corporate Office
as 16-5645
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NIGEL MARLIN REID, II
Defendant - Appellee:
MCDONALDS CORPORATE OFFICE
Reid v. McDonalds Corporate Office
as 2:2016cv00014
Plaintiff:
Nigel Marlin Reid, II
Defendant:
McDonalds Corporate Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
