Cases 41 - 50 of 550
Ebrahimi v. Fields et al
as 3:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Shamim Ebrahimi
Defendant:
Michael R. Fields, Netflix, Inc., Electronic Arts, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Entertainment Studios Networks, Inc. et al v. McDonald's USA, LLC
as 1:2023cv00529
Plaintiff:
Entertainment Studios Networks, Inc. and Weather Group, LLC
Defendant:
McDonald's USA, LLC
Petitioner:
McDonald's Corporation and Christopher Kempczinski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3008
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Manning et al v. McDonald's USA, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00210
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Manning, Christine Crawford, Keith Manning and others
Defendant:
McDonald's USA, LLC and McDonald's Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-16986
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
McDonald's Corporation v. Agri Stats, Inc. et al
as 0:2022cv03106
Plaintiff:
McDonald's Corporation
Defendant:
Agri Stats, Inc., Clemens Food Group, LLC, The Clemens Family Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04833
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
David Webb v. State of Washington, et al
as 22-36008
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID Q. WEBB
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, ROBERT WATSON FERGUSON, Washington State Attorney General, KITSAP COUNTY GOVERNMENT and others
Not Classified By Court:
JOHN GESE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
