Cases 1 - 10 of 33
McElroy v. Doe
as 5:2024cv05031
Plaintiff:
Jerel McElroy
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McElroy v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Jerel McElroy
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
McElroy v. Polack et al
as 5:2024cv05022
Plaintiff:
Jerel R. McElroy
Defendant:
Detention Officer David Pollock, John or Jane Doe Detention Officers, Deputy David Polack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McElroy v. Payne
as 4:2023cv04090
Plaintiff:
James McElroy
Respondent:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hale v. Gentry et al
as 4:2022cv04085
Plaintiff:
James McElroy
Defendant:
Robert Gentry, Arenar Romona, Deputy Chris Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Klingensmith v. Cruz et al
as 5:2019cv05185
Defendant:
Nurse Heather Trimmer, Deputy Megan Rutledge, Lieutenant Robin Holt and others
Plaintiff:
Tyler B. Klingensmith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wheat v. Holloway et al
as 5:2019cv05128
Defendant:
Deputy J. Rhodes, Deputy K. Cogdill, Deputy B. Jornagan and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Lucas Wheat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
El Bey v. Johnson et al
as 3:2019cv00053
Plaintiff:
Sakima Iban Salih El Bey
Defendant:
Arkansas Senate, West Memphis Police Department, Arkansas House of Representatives and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Thomas et al
as 4:2019cv04018
Plaintiff:
Samantha Edwards
Defendant:
Eric James Cornell Thomas and McElroy Truck Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Klingensmith v. Cruz et al
as 5:2018cv05153
Defendant:
Nurse Heather Trimmer, Deputy Megan Rutledge, Lieutenant Robin Holt and others
Plaintiff:
Tyler Klingensmith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
