Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Sanders v. Ward et al
as 7:2024cv00027
Defendant:
Heather W. Pederson, Ingrid Y. Ward, Gregory S. Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
James E Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barnett v. Biden et al
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Caroline S. Barnett
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Federal Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Cavaluzzi et al v. County of Sullivan et al
as 1:2023cv11067
Plaintiff:
Gloria Cavaluzzi, Lyndon C. Alleyne, Petr Andreenko and others
Defendant:
County of Sullivan and Nancy Buck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cavaluzzi et al v. County of Sullivan et al
as 5:2023cv01530
Plaintiff:
Gloria Cavaluzzi, Lyndon C. Alleyne, Petr Andreenko and others
Defendant:
County of Sullivan and Nancy Buck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lytle v. Meachum
as 23-50772
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Christopher Sean Lytle
Defendant / Appellee:
Amy Clark Meachum, Judge, Ken Paxton, Attorney General, State of Texas and Ken Paxton, Attorney General
MEACHUM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv32657
Plaintiff:
JOHN MEACHUM
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Andrews v. Murphy et al
as 1:2023cv00950
Plaintiff:
Dessie Maria Andrews
Defendant:
Tom Murphy, Amy Clark Meachum, Suzanne Covington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lytle v. Meachum
as 1:2023cv00441
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sean Lytle
Defendant:
Amy Clark Meachum and Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
MEACHUM v. USA
as 1:2023cv00471
Plaintiff:
GERALD MEACHUM
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Lytle v. Meachum
as 9:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sean Lytle
Defendant:
Amy Clark Meachum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
