Cases 51 - 60 of 7,089
Medina v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Sonia Medina
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Medina v. Tolleson Elementary School District No. 17 et al
as 2:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
Guillermina Medina
Defendant:
Tolleson Elementary School District No. 17, Tolleson Elementary School District No. 17 Governing Board, Cathey Mayes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01830
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mercado Medina, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1137
Petitioner:
ROGELIO MERCADO MEDINA, ELIA MATA MANCILLA, EMILY MERCADO MATA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Leyva v. Amazon Logistics, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Leyva
Defendant:
Amazon Logistics, Inc., Carranza Trucking, LLC. and Alberto Medina Sarria
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Medina v. USA
as 6:2024cv06130
Petitioner:
Enrique Medina
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
