Cases 51 - 60 of 1,636
Charlie Hardin v. Superintendent Roach
as 23-6973
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLIE L. HARDIN
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ROACH, SUPERINTENDENT ALBRIGHT, SUPERINTENDENT CROWE and others
Medina-Andino v. USA
as 3:2023cv01490
Petitioner:
Carlos Anthony Medina-Andino
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Martinez v. Allison et al
as 5:2023cv04863
Plaintiff:
Adam Martinez
Defendant:
K Allison, J. Robertson, L. Deters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAIG v. HARRY et al
as 2:2023cv03608
Plaintiff:
RUBEN R. CRAIG, III
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, JOHN TERRA, DEPUTY WYNDHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina v. Lumpkin
as 23-70003
Petitioner / Appellant:
Anthony Medina
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Medina (PS) v. Murphy et al
as 1:2023cv02241
Plaintiff:
Delano Medina
Defendant:
Jennifer Murphy and Colorado Parole Board, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina v. Neely
as 7:2023cv01135
Petitioner:
Nativida Mercado Medina
Respondent:
Warden K Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Medina v. Warden, FCI Petersburg Low
as 3:2023cv00538
Petitioner:
Armando Medina
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Petersburg Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
RODRIGUEZ-MEDINA v. DOE et al
as 1:2023cv00145
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND RODRIGUEZ-MEDINA
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, OFFICER WOOD and DOUGHERTY COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
