Cases 1 - 10 of 311
Medrano Hernandez v. Garland
as 24-3022
Petitioner:
JHUSTHYN KUEL MEDRANO HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Medrano Robayo, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2993
Petitioner:
JOHN HERMES MEDRANO ROBAYO, YUDY CAROLINA HERNANDEZ PARRA, DAN JEREMY MEDRANO HERNANDEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Medrano Lopez v. Garland
as 24-1843
Petitioner:
JOSE ANTONIO MEDRANO LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Adams #200957 v. Medrano et al
as 2:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Lamont M Adams
Defendant:
Unknown Medrano, Unknown Freetag, B Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Valenzuela v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv02293
Petitioner:
Armando Medrano Valenzuela
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lloyd's of London Syndicate 2987 v. PCL Homes LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01497
Plaintiff:
Lloyd's of London Syndicate 2987
Defendant:
PCL Homes, LLC, Estate of Jose Trinidad Medrano-Villagran and PCL Homes LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Anthony James Medrano v. Kevin Hixton
as 2:2023cv06431
Petitioner:
Anthony James Medrano
Respondent:
Acting Warden Kevin Hixton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Villalva Medrano, et al. v. Garland
as 23-1551
Petitioner:
JORGE ALEJANDRO ALEJANDRO VILLALVA MEDRANO and MARTHA ISELA DIAZ DORADO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Livier Coronel v. City of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2023cv01030
Plaintiff:
Livier Coronel
Defendant:
City of San Bernardino, Cecelia Medrano Venegas, Jeffrey Harvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
