Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Meek #283894 v. Shinn
as 2:2022cv01175
Plaintiff:
Clenten Lewis Meek
Defendant:
David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meeks v. Penzone et al
as 2:2021cv00683
Plaintiff:
Leonard Antonio Meeks and Leonard Meeks
Defendant:
Tempe Police Department, Maricopa County, Unknown Penzone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BlondZee's Steak House Incorporated v. Mohave, County of et al
as 3:2021cv08078
Defendant:
Mohave County, Axl Lopez, Unknown Parties and others
Plaintiff:
BlondZees Steak House Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lorenzana v. Axway Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00634
Defendant:
Axway Incorporated and Kevin Meeks
Plaintiff:
Diego Lorenzana
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Meeks v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv01073
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Meeks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ford v. Piatt et al
as 2:2018cv03220
Defendant:
J Meeks, A Harrington, T Scheidman and others
Plaintiff:
Jourdyn K Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andreozzi v. Ricotta
as 2:2018cv02400
Defendant:
Unknown Williamson, Bobby Meeks, Ian Connors and others
Plaintiff:
Armand Andreozzi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Meeks v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv03732
Plaintiff:
Donald Meeks
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDaniel-Meeks v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv03516
Plaintiff:
Mashell McDaniel-Meeks
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith-Meeks et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv04468
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Smith-Meeks and Michael Scott Meeks
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
