Cases 1 - 10 of 36
PARSONS v. COUNTY OF ESSEX et al
as 2:2024cv05615
Plaintiff:
DEVIN PARSONS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ESSEX, ESSEX COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and CORRECTION OFFICER MELISSA SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Zafar Iqbal v. BPOA PA State Board of Medicine, et al
as 24-1077
Plaintiff:
ZAFAR IQBAL
Defendant:
BPOA PENNSYLVANIA STATE BOARD OF MEDICINE, CHIEF DONALD K. COKUS, North Fayette Township Police Department, City of Pittsburgh, CURAHEALTH PITTSBURGH LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 American Disabilities Act
IQBAL v. BPOA, PA STATE BOARD OF MEDICINE et al
as 2:2023cv00832
Plaintiff:
ZAFAR IQBAL
Defendant:
BPOA, PA STATE BOARD OF MEDICINE, DONALD J. COKUS, JR., CURAHEALTH PITTSBURGH, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
