Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Hecox, et al. v. Little, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00184
Defendant: Bradley Little, Boise State University, Individual Members of the State Board of Education and others
Plaintiff: Jane Doe and Lindsay Hecox
Intervenor: Madison Kenyon and Mary Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonnie Peltier v. Charter Day School, Inc.
as 20-1023
Defendant / Appellee: CHARTER DAY SCHOOL, INC., CHAD ADAMS, in his capacity as member of the Board of Trustees of Charter Day School, Inc., TED BODENSCHATZ, in his capacity as member of the Board of Trustees of Charter Day School, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ERIKA BOOTH, as Guardian of I.B., a minor child, KEELY BURKS and BONNIE PELTIER, as Guardian of A.P., a minor child
Defendant: THE ROGER BACON ACADEMY, INC.
Bonnie Peltier v. Charter Day School, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1001
Defendant / Appellant: SUZANNE WEST, in her capacity as member of the Board of Trustees of Charter Day School, Inc., MELISSA GOTT, in her capacity as member of the Board of Trustees of Charter Day School, Inc., ROBERT P. SPENCER, in his capacity as member of the Board of Trustees of Charter Day School, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: BONNIE PELTIER, as Guardian of A.P., a minor child, ERIKA BOOTH, as Guardian of I.B., a minor child and KEELY BURKS
Defendant: THE ROGER BACON ACADEMY, INC.
Turning Point USA at Arkansas, et al v. Ron Rhodes, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-3016
Defendant / Appellee: Niel Crowson, Individual and official capacities as member of the Board of Trustees of the Arkansas State University System, Ron Rhodes, In his individual capacity (Originally named in his individual and official capacities as member of the Board of Trustees of the Arkansas State University System), Charles L. Welch, Individual and official capacities as member of the Board of Trustees of the Arkansas State University System and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Turning Point USA at Arkansas State University and Ashlyn Hoggard
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-1615
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-505
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
24 Franklin Ave. R.E. Corp v. Heaship
as 17-1399
Plaintiff - Appellant: 24 Franklin Ave. R.E. Corp and Marc Castaldi
Defendant - Appellee: Thomas Heaship, as members of the Planning Board of the Town/Village of Harrison, Alice AuRutick, as members of the Planning Board of the Town/Village of Harrison, Anthony Spano, as members of the Planning Board of the Town/Village of Harrison and others
D.T. v NECA/IBEW Family Medical Care Plan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00004
Plaintiff: D. T.
Defendant: NECA/IBEW Family Medical Care Plan, The Board of Trustees of the NECA/IBEW Family Medical Care Plan, Salvatore J. Chilia and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Lexjac, LLC v. Beckerman
as 16-3844
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant: Lexjac, LLC and Richard Entel
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee: The Board of Trustees of the Incorporated Village of Muttontown and Incorporated Village of Muttontown
Defendant-Counter-Claimant: Carl Juul-Nielson, J. Randolph Bartholomew, Pat Miller, individually and in their official capacity as Member of the Board of Trustees of the Incorporated Village of Muttontown and others
Lexjac, LLC v. Beckerman
as 16-3357
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant: Lexjac, LLC and Richard Entel
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee: The Board of Trustees of the Incorporated Village of Muttontown and Incorporated Village of Muttontown
Defendant-Counter-Claimant: Carl Juul-Nielson, J. Randolph Bartholomew, Pat Miller, individually and in their official capacity as Member of the Board of Trustees of the Incorporated Village of Muttontown and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?