Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv26387
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv07447
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00937
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Unknown:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv05563
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02757
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
United States of America v. Meneses-Lopez
as 26-5300
Defendant:
JESUS MANUEL MENESES-LOPEZ, Jesus Manuel Meneses Lopez and Jesus Menses Lopez
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Meneses v. IRWIN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 7:2026cv00219
Petitioner:
Luis Santiago Villareal Meneses
Respondent:
WARDEN IRWIN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, KRISTEN SULLIVAN, DAVID VENTURELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01935
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Galicia Meneses v. Blanche
as 26-4759
Petitioner:
CESAR ANTONIO GALICIA MENESES
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Meneses v. Bombomania, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv24875
Plaintiff:
Raul Meneses
Defendant:
Bombomania, Inc. and Roberto Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
