Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-6467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Merlin Williams v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
as 24-6386
Plaintiff:
MERLIN LKENT WILLIAMS
Defendant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INCORPORATED, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY, LIMITED, GOOGLE LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Samsung Electronics American Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01208
Plaintiff:
Merlin Lkent Williams
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics American Inc., Samsung Electronics LTD/ Samsung Group, Google, LLC/Alphabet Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merlin Williams v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 23-2676
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Merlin Lkent Williams
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Mississippi, Muriel B. Ellis, Jim M. Greenlee and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5099
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Williams v. State of Mississippi
as 23-60180
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Merlin Lkent Williams
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Mississippi, Harrison County Sheriff Department A.D.C., Gulfport Police Department and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00351
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
WILLIAMS v. USA
as 1:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
MERLIN LKENT WILLIAMS
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Williams v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
Merlin Lkent Williams
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Harrison County Sheriff Dept. A.D.C., Gulfport Police Dept. and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
