Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Lenhardt v. Zuckerberg et al
as 4:2026cv06517
Plaintiff:
Ursula Lenhardt
Defendant:
Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook/Meta Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Moses v. Bondi et al
as 1:2025cv04020
Plaintiff:
Seth Moses
Defendant:
Pam Bondi, Department of Labor, Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
In re: Kotevski
as 25-4094
Petitioner:
In re: MILAN MICHAEL KOTEVSKI
Respondent:
HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, GEORGE H.W. BUSH and others
Lenhardt v. Zuckerberg et al
as 5:2025cv04057
Plaintiff:
Ursula Lenhardt
Defendant:
Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook/Meta Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Holsey et al v. Sutherland Global Services Inc. et al
as 6:2025cv06269
Plaintiff:
Mone Emani Falishia Holsey, D.M.C. Jr., Klinofe A. Holsey, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Sutherland Global Services Inc., Meta Inc. and Meta Platforms Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
MURGIDA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2025cv00477
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH PAUL MURGIDA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ARC MID-ATLANTIC EXCESS & SURPLUS, INC., STANLEY QUIRK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Kotevski
as 25-4016
Petitioner:
In re: MILAN MICHAEL KOTEVSKI
Respondent:
HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, GEORGE H.W. BUSH and others
Alkhayer v. Meta Inc.
as 3:2025cv00309
Petitioner:
Farres Alkhayer
Respondent:
Meta Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Will v. Meta Inc.
as 8:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
Matthew A. Will
Defendant:
Facebook and Meta Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCarthy v. Facebook, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv14322
Plaintiff:
Steven M. McCarthy
Defendant:
Facebook, Inc., Meta, Inc., Mark Elliott Zuckerberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.