Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Metcalf v. USA
as 5:2024cv00073
Petitioner:
Britton Nicole Metcalf
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Meyers v. Jenkins et al
as 5:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Amy Jenkins, R. Honeycutt, Jeffrey P. Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Skerritt et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv04927
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
James Skerritt, Yolanda Johnson, Charles Gamble and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
David Meyers v. Mr. Honeycut
as 23-6931
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. HONEYCUTT, Alexander Correctional Institute Warden, FARRISH, Unit Manager, TIMOTHY METCALF and others
Metcalf v. GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00598
Plaintiff:
James Andrew Metcalf
Defendant:
GEO Group, Inc., Esker Tatum, Stephen Herrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Metcalf v. DuPont et al
as 3:2023cv00592
Plaintiff:
Melonie Metcalf
Defendant:
DuPont and Ampthill Rayon Workers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Gladden v. Quinn et al
as 5:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
Tyrone D. Gladden
Defendant:
Joshua T. Quinn, Darren C Daves, Joshua L Sigmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Wagner et al
as 5:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Maurice Johnson
Defendant:
FNU Wagner, FNU Smith, FNU Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Honeycutt et al
as 5:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Mr. FNU Honeycutt, FNU Farrish, Timothy Metcalf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Duncan et al
as 5:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Jeffrey P. Duncan, FNU Freeman, Joshua Sigmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
