Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Luxco, Inc. v. Nelson County et al
as 3:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Luxco, Inc.
Defendant:
Nelson County, Nelson County Fiscal Court, Judge Executive Tim Hutchins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Metcalf v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00490
Plaintiff:
Tamara Metcalf
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Raytheon Company v. Ahtna Support and Training Services, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00239
Defendant:
David L. Metcalf, Ahtna Netiye', LLC, Ahtna Support and Training Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Raytheon Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Metcalf v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv00172
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Tamara Metcalf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Metcalf v. Cigna Group Insurance
as 3:2020cv00580
Defendant:
Cigna Group Insurance and Life Insurance Company of North America
Plaintiff:
Janet Metcalf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 eb
Metcalf v. Prudential Insurance Company of America Disability Management Services
as 3:2019cv00293
Plaintiff:
Tamera Metcalf
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America Disability Management Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 eb
Metcalf v. Akers et al
as 5:2018cv00625
Plaintiff:
Floyd Metcalf, Jr.
Defendant:
Daniel Akers and Nikki Beckstrum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Metcalfe v. Southern Health Partners et al
as 3:2016cv00616
Plaintiff:
Tony Metcalfe
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners, Carman and Christy L.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cavezza v. Metcalf et al
as 5:2016cv00225
Plaintiff:
Jessica Cavezza
Defendant:
Emma Metcalf, Yvonne Chabot, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
