Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Michael Gardner v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 23-2343
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Valentine Gardner
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, ADC, Thomas Hurst, Warden, Grimes Unit, ADC and John Moss, Deputy Warden, Grimes Unit, ADC
Michael Gardner v. USA
as 23-1388
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL TAYLOR GARDNER
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Gardner v. Warden Colbert - U.S.P. Yazoo City, MS et al
as 3:2023cv00275
Plaintiff:
Michael William Gardner
Defendant:
Warden Colbert - U.S.P. Yazoo City, MS and Bureau of Prisons (B.O.P.)
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gardner v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv01138
Plaintiff:
Michael Valentine Gardner
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, T Hurst and J Moss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gardner v. Page et al
as 3:2021cv00116
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Joshua Jones, Rory L Griffin and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Valentine Gardner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner v. Page et al
as 3:2021cv00060
Defendant:
Kenny Davis, Richard Lee, Joe Page, III and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Valentine Gardner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner v. Page et al
as 3:2021cv00033
Defendant:
Kenny Davis, Dexter Payne and Joe Page, III
Plaintiff:
Michael Valentine Gardner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner v. USA
as 2:2019cv12088
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Michael Taylor Gardner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gardner v. Smith et al
as 4:2019cv04068
Plaintiff:
Michael V. Gardner
Defendant:
Corporal Smith, Warden Walker, Captain Golden Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ohlendorf v. Hoeh et al
as 1:2019cv00034
Defendant:
Thomas L. Hoeh, William L. Syler, Michael J. Gardner and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Bryan Ohlendorf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
