Cases 11 - 20 of 213
Michael Davis v. United States
as 22-2259
Petitioner / Appellant:
Michael Ray Davis
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Davis v. ATL. Fulton Co. Judiciary et al
as 1:2022cv02726
Plaintiff:
Michael B. Davis
Defendant:
ATL. Fulton Co. Judiciary, Sheriffs Office, Atlanta Police Deptmt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. State of Alaska
as 3:2022cv00116
Petitioner:
Michael Joseph Davis
Defendant:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. State of Alaska
as 3:2022cv00073
Petitioner:
Michael Joseph Davis, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Henderson
as 22-20035
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael William Davis
Defendant / Appellee:
Sheriff Rand Henderson, Magistrate Paul Damico, Officer Rose and others
DeLoge v. Wyoming Supreme Court Chief Justice et al
as 2:2021cv00076
Defendant:
Wyoming Supreme Court Chief Justice, Wyoming Supreme Court Former Chief Justice, Michael K Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Steven A DeLoge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Maginnis
as 22-20011
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael William Davis, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Patty Maginnis, Judge, Adam McLane, District Attorney, Sophia Korndorffer, Attorney and others
Davis v. USA
as 4:2021cv00792
Petitioner:
Michael R. Davis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Davis v. HomeWav et al
as 8:2021cv02580
Plaintiff:
Michael Spurgon Davis
Defendant:
Homeway, LLC, Starfield Technologies, Inc. and HomeWav
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael L. Davis v. USP Victorville Unit Officers (2B) on 12/13/2019 et al
as 5:2021cv01551
Petitioner:
Michael L. Davis
Respondent:
USP Victorville Unit Officers (2B) on and Elizee Ben-Shmuel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
