Cases 21 - 30 of 34
DAVIS et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2014cv06979
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E. DAVIS and GLOBAL SALES CALL CENTER, LLC
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. San Francisco Jail
as 3:2014cv03063
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Davis
Defendant:
San Francisco Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Santa Rita Jail et al
as 3:2014cv01468
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Davis
Defendant:
Santa Rita Jail and County of Alameda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kearney v. Davis et al
as 1:2013cv01852
Plaintiff:
Richard Muliek Kearney
Defendant:
Michael J. Davis, Charles E. Gleichman and Kane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
City of North Las Vegas v. Davis
as 2:2013cv00156
Plaintiff:
City of North Las Vegas
Defendant:
Michael C Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Clark et al v. Hennepin County Court et al
as 0:2012cv03089
Plaintiff:
Jill Clark , Jill Clark, LLC , Jill Clark, P.A. and others
Defendant:
Hennepin County Court , Minnesota Court of Appeals, the , Minnesota Supreme Court, the and others
Joeffre Kolosky, et al v. Honorable Michael J. Davi
as 12-2033
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joeffre Kolosky
Defendant - Appellee:
Honorable Michael J. Davis, Chief Judge, acting in official capacity as a Judge
Movant - Appellee:
Lee A. Lastovich, Huyen Le Phan and Gregg Marlowe Corwin
Kolosky v. Davis
as 0:2011cv03648
Plaintiff:
Joeffre Kolosky
Defendant:
Michael J. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seoane v. The City of Monticello et al
as 7:2011cv02179
Plaintiff:
Giovanni Seoane
Defendant:
The City of Monticello , James Farrell, The District Attorney Sullivan County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. SHERIFF OF HENERY COUNTY BUTCH BAKER et al
as 1:2008cv01310
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. DAVIS and MICHAEL A. DAVIS
Defendant:
SHERIFF OF HENERY COUNTY BUTCH BAKER, JESSE TRENNENPOHO, PATRICK CAMPBELL and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
