Cases 1 - 9 of 9
MALEK v. DUFFY et al
as 2:2023cv04344
Defendant:
SAFE HORIZON, CORPORATION COUNSEL, MATTHEW DUFFY and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MALEK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KING v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2022cv01834
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RAY KING
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KING v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2021cv01461
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray King
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V, PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS HOLDING USA INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING v. MAHALLY et al
as 2:2017cv03540
Petitioner:
MICHAEL P. KING
Respondent:
LAWRENCE P. MAHALLY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KING et al v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv64087
Plaintiff:
BONNIE J KING , MICHAEL F KING , WILLIAM A KING and others
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, DANIEL E DELBERT, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP et al
as 2:2010cv68927
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL P. KING and CAROLYN KING
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP , PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION , UNITED STATES MINERAL PRODUCTS CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Michael King
as 09-1434
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL D. KING
King v. Rios et al
as 3:2008cv02295
Plaintiff:
Michael R. King
Defendant:
Hector A. Rios, Jr. and Shari Slone
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
KING v. AC&S INC et al
as 2:2008cv90181
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL I KING
Defendant:
AC&S INC, AC&S INC, AC&S INC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
