Cases 1 - 10 of 121
Powell v. Lumpkin
as 24-10851
Petitioner:
Michael A. Powell
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
State of Texas for the Use of Michael Elliot Powell v. Skillern et al
as 9:2024cv00160
Defendant:
Michael Killern and Texas Municipal League Joint Self-Insurance Fund Liability Coverage Document Defendant Bond
Plaintiff:
State of Texas for the Use of Michael Elliot Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Powell v. Lumpkin
as 24-10702
Petitioner:
Michael A. Powell
Respondent:
State of Texas and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Powell v. The State of Texas
as 4:2024cv00614
Petitioner:
Michael A Powell
Respondent:
The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Powell v. Martin
as 24-20068
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Powell
Defendant:
Martin #9327, Navasota Police Department Office
POWELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv11339
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY POWELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Powell v. Michael Skillern for the use of Antonio Pantoja et al
as 3:2023cv01757
Plaintiff:
Michael Elliot Powell
Defendant:
Michael Skillern for the use of Antonio Pantoja and Texas Municipal League Intergovernmental Risk Pool
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Powell v. Knowles
as 3:2023cv01686
Plaintiff:
Michael Elliot Powell
Defendant:
Adam A Knowles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA v. Jeremy Powell
as 23-12565
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JEREMY MICHAEL LEE POWELL
Powell v. Knowles
as 2:2023cv02137
Plaintiff:
Michael E Powell
Defendant:
Adam Knowles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
