Cases 11 - 20 of 304
Wilson v. Mullins et al
as 7:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Wilson
Defendant:
R. Mullins, D. Holland, C. Bower and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06425
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B WILSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilson v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv13231
Plaintiff:
Michael T Wilson
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WILSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv24149
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DWAYNE WILSON and MICHAEL WILSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilson v. Lippert Components Inc
as 3:2022cv00919
Plaintiff:
Michael A Wilson
Defendant:
Lippert Components Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
WILSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14329
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JAMES WILSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WILSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12612
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHN WILSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WIlson v. Collier
as 3:2022cv00262
Petitioner:
Michael Tyrone WIlson
Respondent:
Brian Collier and Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henning et al v. Fentress et al
as 4:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Henning, Michael L. Wilson and Jesse D. Henry
Defendant:
Nicki Fentress, Cassie Thompson, Tamberly McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. State of Nevada
as 2:2022cv00978
Petitioner:
Michael W. Wilson
Respondent:
State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
