Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Young, Jr. v. Kendall
as 9:2024cv00236
Petitioner:
Michael J. Young, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Brian Kendall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
US v. Michael Young, Jr.
as 23-6830
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL JAMES YOUNG, JR., a/k/a Unc
Young v. Wyoming Attorney General et al
as 2:2022cv00181
Respondent:
Park County Sheriff, Wyoming Attorney General, Scott Steward and others
Petitioner:
Michael W Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Stirling et al
as 9:2022cv02249
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Young, Jr. and Michael J Young, Jr
Defendant:
Bryan P. Stirling, Dennis R. Patterson, Tashena Nicole Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Young v. USA
as 3:2022cv01822
Petitioner:
Michael James Young, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Young v. Faulkner County Department of Human Services et al
as 4:2022cv00144
Plaintiff:
Michael Brandon Young
Defendant:
Faulkner County Department of Human Services, Kathy Harper and Melissa Lowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Faulkner County Department of Human Services et al
as 5:2022cv05028
Plaintiff:
Michael Brandon Young
Defendant:
Faulkner County Department of Human Services, Kathy Harper and Melissa Lowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MICHAEL KENNETH YOUNG v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2021cv01984
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KENNETH YOUNG
Defendant:
DAN JOHNSON and DAVID W FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2021cv01986
Petitioner:
MICHAEL KENNETH YOUNG
Respondent:
DAN JOHNSON and DAVID FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
YOUNG v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2021cv01985
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KENNETH YOUNG
Defendant:
DAN JOHNSON and DAVID FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
