Cases 21 - 30 of 203
Joseph D'Angelo v. Bank of Dene et al
as 2:2021mc01052
Plaintiff:
Joseph D'Angelo
Defendant:
Bank of Dene and Michael Stephen Young
MICHAEL KENNETH YOUNG v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2021cv01984
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KENNETH YOUNG
Defendant:
DAN JOHNSON and DAVID W FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2021cv01986
Petitioner:
MICHAEL KENNETH YOUNG
Respondent:
DAN JOHNSON and DAVID FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
YOUNG v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2021cv01985
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KENNETH YOUNG
Defendant:
DAN JOHNSON and DAVID FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Young v. Commissioner of Corrections
as 21-1366
Defendant / Appellee:
Commissioner of Corrections
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael A. Young
YOUNG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv16673
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL W YOUNG
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Van Overdam v. Texas A & M Univ
as 21-20185
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Austin Van Overdam
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael K. Young, In his official capacity, Dayna Ford, In her official capacity, Kristen Harrell, In her official capacity and others
Young et al v. Lamont et al
as 3:2021cv00474
Defendant:
Burgos, Edwards, Eagleson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Young, Brian Hogan and Westly Lopes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Overdam v. Texas A & M Univ
as 21-90008
Respondent:
Dayna Ford, In her official capacity, Kristen Harrell, In her official capacity, Texas A & M University and others
Petitioner:
Austin Van Overdam
USSEC v. Stewart, et al
as 21-1075
Defendant:
DCC ISLANDS FOUNDATION, MEDIATRIX CAPITAL PR LLC, TF ALLIANCE, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. STEWART, VICTORIA M. STEWART, HANNA OHONKOVA SEWALL and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Receiver:
BRICK KANE OF ROBB EVANS & ASSOCIATES LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
