Cases 1 - 10 of 13
ACEVEDO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv22188
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ACEVEDO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Yuwsuf Ghafoor, et al v. Professional Transportation, Incorporated, et al
as 23-2813
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YUWSUF A. GHAFOOR, ELIZABETH A. ACEVEDO, RICHIE L. ACEVEDO and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INCORPORATED, an Indiana corporation licensed to conduct business in Illinois and RONALD D. ROMAIN
MOHR v. PENCHISHEN et al
as 5:2022cv03458
Petitioner:
PATRICK MOHR
Respondent:
DAVID PENCHISHEN, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, MICHAEL ACEVEDO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00820
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
ACEVEDO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv28719
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ACEVEDO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ACEVEDO v. THOMAS et al
as 4:2019cv00262
Defendant:
T THOMAS and T THORPE
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ACEVEDO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acevedo v. Presbyterian Healthcare Services
as 1:2015cv00873
Plaintiff:
Michael Acevedo
Defendant:
Presbyterian Healthcare Services, Presbyterian Hospital and ABQ Ambulance Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acevedo v. Cerame et al
as 1:2015cv00872
Plaintiff:
Michael Acevedo
Defendant:
David Cerame and Allen Sigmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acevedo v. Martin
as 5:2013cv00187
Plaintiff:
Michael Acevedo
Defendant:
Mark Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Acevedo v. State of Maryland
as 1:2012cv03246
Petitioner:
Michael Acevedo
Defendant:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
