Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Johnson v. Office of the Hennepin County Public Defender
as 0:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Michael Alfred Johnson
Defendant:
Office of the Hennepin County Public Defender
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STERLING v. IRIS ENERGY LIMITED et al
as 1:2022cv07273
Plaintiff:
SCOTT STERLING
Defendant:
IRIS ENERGY LIMITED, DANIEL ROBERTS, WILLIAM ROBERTS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
STERLING v. IRIS ENERGY LIMITED et al
as 2:2022cv07273
Plaintiff:
SCOTT STERLING
Defendant:
IRIS ENERGY LIMITED, DANIEL ROBERTS, WILLIAM ROBERTS and others
Petitioner:
MARY-JANE OWEN, Network Racing Pty Ltd., Nahi Beaini and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
MALOUF v. IRIS ENERGY LIMITED et al
as 1:2022cv07137
Plaintiff:
JARRYD ANTHONY MALOUF
Defendant:
IRIS ENERGY LIMITED, DANIEL ROBERTS, WILLIAM ROBERTS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Alfred et al v. Travelers Personal Insurance Company
as 4:2022cv00765
Plaintiff:
Michael & Catherine Alfred, Michael Alfred and Catherine Alfred
Defendant:
Travelers Personal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
TERLAJE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13306
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALFRED TERLAJE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2022cv00294
Petitioner:
Michael Alfred Johnson
Respondent:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv55340
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALFRED SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maestrey v. Allen
as 2:2021cv00171
Petitioner:
Michael Alfred Maestrey
Respondent:
Marty Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
USA v. Green
as 20-11260
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael Alfred Green
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
