Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Estes v. Astrue et al
as 1:2013cv01011
Plaintiff:
Thomas Estes
Defendant:
Michael Astrue, Chris Duryea, Pamela Schwalm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Keith Judd et al v. Barack Obama et al
as 8:2012cv01888
Defendant:
Michael Astrue, John Avlon, Ballot Law Commission of State of New Hampshire and others
Plaintiff:
David Farrar, Keith Judd, Leah Lax and others
Schenk v. Social Security Administration
as 12-4361
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carolyn Schenk
Defendant:
Miss. Biondadillo, Francis, Caban and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Social Security Administration and Michael Astrue
Keith Judd et al v. Barack Obama et al
as 8:2012cv01507
Defendant:
Michael Astrue, John Avlon, Ballot Law Commission of State of Hew Hampshire and others
Plaintiff:
David Farrar, Keith Judd, Leah Lax and others
Shenk v. Astrue et al
as 1:2012cv04386
Respondent:
Michael Astrue, PO Caban, Chan and others
Petitioner:
Carolyn Shenk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Schenk v. Social Security Administration et al
as 1:2012cv04370
Defendant:
Michael Astrue, Miss Biondadillo, Caban and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Schenk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Taitz v. Sebelius et al
as 3:2012cv03251
Plaintiff:
Orly Taitz
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius , Barrack Hussein Obama , Nancy Pelosi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shenk v. Astrue et al
as 1:2012cv06410
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Shenk
Defendant:
Michael Astrue, Miss Biondadilldo, Francis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. v. Kathleen Sebelius et al
as 8:2012cv01092
Defendant:
Michael Astrue, William A Chatfield, Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
