Cases 1 - 10 of 10
WILSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06425
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B WILSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jennmar of Kentucky Inc et al v. Wilson et al
as 2:2020cv01086
Defendant:
Michael B Wilson, Jamas Technology Inc and Curtis R Wilson
Plaintiff:
Jennmar of Kentucky Inc and Compliance Staffing Agency LLC doing business as Jennmar Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Esther Collar v. Michael Wilson, et al
as 19-12027
Defendant / Appellee:
PAMELA STOCKTON, MICHAEL B. WILSON, WENDY RIVERA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ESTHER COLLAR
Collar v. Wilson et al
as 1:2018cv21334
Plaintiff:
Esther Collar
Defendant:
Michael B. Wilson, Wendy Rivera, Henry Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilson v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv17649
Plaintiff:
Michael B. Wilson
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
United States of America v. Wilson
as 1:2012mc91062
Petitioner:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael B. Wilson
Christopher Clayton, Sr. v. Brazos County Sheriff Office, et al
as 11-20459
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER LEE CLAYTON, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAZOS COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE, CHRISTOPHER C. KIRK, WAYNE DICKY and others
Clayton v. Brazos County Sheriff Office et al
as 4:2011cv01405
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Clayton, Sr.
Defendant:
Brazos County Sheriff Office, Christopher C Kirk, Wayne Dicky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Kirk et al
as 4:2010cv02037
Plaintiff:
Richard Casarez Lopez
Defendant:
Christopher C Kirk , Michael B Wilson and Wayne Dicky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
