Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Brooks v. Stoy et al
as 1:2024cv00369
Plaintiff:
Michael Brooks
Defendant:
Stoy, Williams, Officer Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Cole et al
as 1:2023cv01807
Plaintiff:
Michael Brooks
Defendant:
Cole, Spoone, Stoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv04190
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Brown, David Daniel Ackman, Richard Acosta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Brooks v. Attorney General et al
as 4:2023cv01536
Plaintiff:
Michael Brooks, Michael D Brooks and Michael Donta Brooks
Defendant:
Attorney General, Florence Clerk of Court and Joshua A Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Black v. Brooks et al
as 1:2022cv01262
Plaintiff:
Christopher William Black
Defendant:
Michael Brooks, Danisha Williams and R. Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black v. Brooks et al
as 7:2022cv00563
Plaintiff:
Christopher William Black
Defendant:
Michael Brooks, Danisha Williams and R. Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodman v. Brooks et al
as 1:2021cv00522
Plaintiff:
Mr. Lynwood A Goodman
Defendant:
Beth Cabell, Michael Brooks and D Raines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Brooks
as 1:2021cv00125
Plaintiff:
William Robert Banks
Defendant:
Michael Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. Clark et al
as 3:2020cv00783
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Alfred Gervin, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Fields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TEASLEY v. STEIN
as 1:2020cv00791
Defendant:
KATHERINE GLENN, JOSHUA STEIN, CHARLES WENTZ, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
KENYA TEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
