Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Harris v. Brooks et al
as 3:2023cv01053
Plaintiff:
Robert Harris, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael Brooks, Metro Govt. of Nashville, CPL Statler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks et al v. Peoples Bank
as 2:2023cv03043
Plaintiff:
Latasha Brooks and Michael Brooks
Defendant:
Peoples Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Brooks v. Brewer
as 7:2023cv00067
Petitioner:
Michael Brooks
Respondent:
David Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brook v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv03168
Plaintiff:
Michael Brook
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brooks v. CVH Lexington, LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
Michael Brooks
Defendant:
CVH Lexington, LLC, Dreamland Hospitality, LLC doing business as Home2Suites, Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Brooks et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01643
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BROOKS and LATASHA BROOKS
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Integon General Insurance Corporation v. Boyd et al
as 1:2020cv02811
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Child Support Enforcement Agency, THOMAS LEE, LA VERNE N BOYD and others
Plaintiff:
INTEGON GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and Integon General Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
