Cases 1 - 10 of 54
CAIN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 5:2024cv01098
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN MICHAEL CAIN
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cain v. Warden of Franklin County Prison et al
as 4:2024cv00246
Petitioner:
Jonathan Michael Cain
Respondent:
Warden of Franklin County Prison and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Julia Hubbard et al v. Trammell S. Crow, Jr. et al
as 5:2023cv00580
Plaintiff:
Julia Hubbard and Kayla Goedinghaus
Defendant:
Trammell S Crow, Jr., Dr. Benjamin Todd Eller, Richard Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Cain et al v. Total Quality Logistics, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00328
Plaintiff:
Michael Cain and Sarah Cain
Defendant:
Total Quality Logistics, LLC, Edsal Manufacturing Company, Inc. and McLeod Express, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07957
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
CAIN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21381
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CAIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cain et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03683
Plaintiff:
Michael Cain and Jeanette Cain
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CAIN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13062
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA MICHAEL CAIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CAINES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14007
Plaintiff:
SEAN MICHAEL CAINES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
