Civil Rights Cases
Anita Earls v. North Carolina Judicial Standards Commission
as 23-2229
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANITA SUE EARLS
Defendant / Appellee: NORTH CAROLINA JUDICIAL STANDARDS COMMISSION, THE HONORABLE CHRIS DILLON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHAIR OF THE NORTH CAROLINA JUDICIAL STANDARDS COMMISSION, THE HONORABLE DAWN M. LAYTON, MEMBER OF THE NORTH CAROLINA JUDICIAL STANDARDS COMMISSION, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY and others
EARLS v. NORTH CAROLINA JUDICIAL STANDARDS COMMISSION, THE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00734
Plaintiff: ANITA S. EARLS
Defendant: NORTH CAROLINA JUDICIAL STANDARDS COMMISSION, THE, THE HONORABLE CHRIS DILLON, THE HONORABLE DAWN M. LAYTON and others
Petitioner: LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00574
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Quality Investment Group, Inc. v. Silverman et al
as 4:2020cv06627
Defendant: Jorge Infante, Cynthia Gawley-Uy, Gary B. Silverman and others
Plaintiff: Quality Investment Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Quality Investment Group, Inc. v. Silverman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv01239
Defendant: Jorge Infante, Purificacion M. Infante, Gary B. Silverman and others
Plaintiff: Quality Investment Group, Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CROWELL v. NORTH CAROLINA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00515
Plaintiff: MICHAEL CROWELL
Defendant: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA , ROY COOPER , BIPARTISAN STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS AND ETHICS ENFORCEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Type: Civil Rights Voting

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?