Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Ross v. Kent County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Terrell Ross
Defendant:
Kent County Sheriff's Department, Grand Rapids, City of, Grand Rapids Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Kemp v. Southeast Utilities of Georgia LLC
as 3:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Michael Dean Kemp
Defendant:
SOUTHEAST UTILITIES OF GEORGIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Darryl Browder v. Jerome Tiller, et al
as 24-1044
Plaintiff:
Darryl Keith Browder
Defendant:
Jerome Tiller, Des Moines Police Officer, Christopher R. Kemp, Judge, Brendan Greiner, Judge and others
Gonzales v. Dryden et al
as 7:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
Mr. Michael Dean Gonzales
Defendant:
Attorney Pro Tem Woodson Erich Dryden, Chief of Police Michael Gerke, Director Steven C. McCraw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nichole O. v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Nichole O.
Defendant:
County of Riverside, a public entity, Michael Dean, 1-10 DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Skyler Diaz v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2021cv00856
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Michael Dean and Does 1 through 10, Jointly and Severally
Plaintiff:
Skylar Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv03025
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Leake et al v. Drinkard
as 1:2019cv03463
Plaintiff:
Richard Leake and Michael Dean
Defendant:
James T. Drinkard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ciempa v. Del City City of et al
as 5:2018cv00955
Defendant:
Ken Bartlett, Pam Finch, Del City City of and others
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Ciempa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dean v. Galt Place Senior Living
as 2:2018cv01693
Plaintiff:
Michael Dean
Defendant:
Galt Place Senior Living
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
