Cases 1 - 10 of 25
DODD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv20345
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DODD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Metropolitan Lloyds Insurance Company of Texas v. Optum Services Inc et al
as 3:2021cv02838
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Lloyds Insurance Company of Texas
Defendant:
Optum Services Inc, Michael Dodds, Law Office of B Ward Maedgen PC and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
The People and Culture Committee, Texas Health, The Governance Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
United States v. Trenton Dodd
as 21-1003
Defendant / Appellant:
Trenton Michael Dodd
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
DODD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv23453
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DODD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chioma Onukwugha v. University Health System, et al
as 19-50679
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS CULWELL, University Health System, VENUS CARMELITA SAN ANDRES, University Health System, MICHELLE GARCIA, University Health System and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHIOMA ONUKWUGHA
Torres v. Jones et al
as 5:2018cv00610
Plaintiff:
Waldemar A Torres
Defendant:
John Doe, Julie Jones and Michael Dodd
Interested Party:
Carmen E Gonzalez and Gabriel R Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Dodd
as 18-2320
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Michael Dodd, AKA Mike, AKA Michael Stanley
Dodd v. United States of America
as 18-2015
Petitioner - Appellant:
Michael Dodd
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Dodds v. AEP Texas Inc.
as 4:2018cv02219
Plaintiff:
Michael Dodds
Defendant:
AEP Texas Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00858
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
