Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Polk et al v. Taishan Gypsum Co., Ltd. et al
as 2:2017cv08287
Plaintiff: Donna Polk , Charles Bowden , Alean Lampton and others
Defendant: Taishan Gypsum Co. Ltd., Tai'an Taishan Plasterboard Co., Ltd., Beijing New Building Materials Public Limited Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Polk et al v. Taishan Gypsum Co., Ltd. et al
as 1:2017cv00216
Plaintiff: Donna Polk , Charles Bowden , Alean Lampton and others
Defendant: Taishan Gypsum Co., Ltd., Tai'an Taishan Plasterboard Co., Ltd., Beijing New Building Materials Public Limited Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edwards v. Everett et al.
as 2:2015cv00171
Plaintiff: Ronnie Gene Edwards
Defendant: Kent Michael Everett, Xpress Global Systems, Inc. and U.S. Xpress, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Carter v. William Stephens, Director
as 13-20369
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL EVERETTE CARTER
Respondent - Appellee: WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Everett v. Fore
as 1:2012cv00001
Plaintiff: Michael Everett
Defendant: J.S. Fore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carter v. Thaler
as 4:2011cv02206
Petitioner: Michael Everette Carter
Respondent: Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: Michael Carter
as 11-20282
Movant: In re: MICHAEL EVERETTE CARTER
Mabry v. TDCJ-CID
as 4:2010cv00371
Plaintiff: Michael Everett Mabry
Defendant: Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mabry v. TDCJ-CID
as 4:2010cv00032
Plaintiff: Michael Everett Mabry
Defendant: Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mabry v. Parkey et al
as 4:2010cv00030
Plaintiff: Michael Everett Mabry
Defendant: Benney Parkey, FNU Rich and Doug Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?