Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Ford v. 3M et al
as 4:2022cv05089
Plaintiff:
Damien Michael Ford
Defendant:
Department of Defense 3M, Fairchild Airforce Base, Tyco Fire Products and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford, Jr. v. Juul Labs Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv09418
Defendant:
McLane Company, Inc., James Monsees, 7-Eleven, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Ford, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Ford, et al v. [24]7.AI, Inc.
as 19-15462
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUDOLPH DUBROVSZKY, MADISON COPELAND, MICHAEL FORD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
[24]7.AI, INC.
Ford, Jr. v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2018cv01755
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Gary Michael Ford, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g
Federal Trade Commission v. HITE Media Group, LLC et al
as 2:2018ms00070
Defendant:
2 Unique, LLC, Amazing App, LLC, HITE Media Group, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Federal Trade Commission v. Hite Media Group LLC et al
as 2:2018cv02221
Defendant:
Amazing App LLC, Jeremy Silvers, Shawn Stumbo and others
Receiver:
Stephen J Donell
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053
Ford et al v. 24/7, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv02770
Plaintiff:
Rudolph Dubrovszky, Michael Ford, Madison Copeland and others
Defendant:
24/7, Inc., Best Buy Co., Inc., Delta Airlines Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ford et al v. 24/7, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv02767
Plaintiff:
Rudolph Dubrovszky and Michael Ford
Defendant:
24/7, Inc. and Best Buy Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Omar Castillon, et al v. CCA
as 17-35896
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OMAR CASTILLON, DUSTY KNIGHT, JUSTIN KEITH PETERSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Mark Ford v. Brian Williams, et al
as 17-17185
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARK MICHAEL FORD
Respondent - Appellee:
BRIAN WILLIAMS and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
