Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 42
USA v. Chase Gary
as 24-11248
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: CHASE MICHAEL GARY
In re: Parker
as 24-5023
Petitioner: MICHAEL GARY PARKER, JR.
Respondent: CARRIE BRIDGES
JURI Holdings LLC v. Kolodin
as 3:2023cv01314
Plaintiff: JURI Holdings LLC
Defendant: Michael Gary Kolodin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA)
Shelby v. Phoenix Investment Partners, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00656
Plaintiff: Michael Gary Shelby
Defendant: Phoenix Investment Partners, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Parker v Bridges
as 4:2022cv00340
Petitioner: Michael Gary Parker, Jr
Respondent: Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NORTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv00423
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL GARY NORTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gary v. Carbon Cycle Arizona LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv02796
Plaintiff: Michael Gary
Defendant: Tom Mulholland, Samuel W Grossman, Jerry Kovacich and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Rhoden v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv00893
Plaintiff: Michael Gary Rhoden
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
In re: Carlton Gary We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-10989
Petitioner: In re: CARLTON MICHAEL GARY
Successive Habeas Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
SHAW v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv03036
Defendant: COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff: MICHAEL GARY SHAW
225) 264-8780 (fax: Peyton P. Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?