Cases 11 - 20 of 63
Hayden v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv10848
Plaintiff:
Michael Hayden
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Bahrampour v. Secretary of Air Force et al
as 1:2019cv01362
Defendant:
Stanford School of Medicine, Fidelity Investments, In-Q-Tel and others
Plaintiff:
Afshin Bahrampour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02773
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Hayden v. Seminole Masonry, LLC
as 6:2019cv00582
Plaintiff:
Michael Hayden
Defendant:
Quantum Construction Management, LLC, Seminole Masonry, LLC and New Seminole Masonry, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hayden v. Sollie
as 3:2019cv00187
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Owen Michael Hayden, III
Defendant:
Bill Sollie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hayden v. Lauderdale County Circuit Court
as 3:2019cv00058
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Petitioner:
Owen Michael Hayden, III
Respondent:
Lauderdale County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hayden v. Biomet, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00678
Plaintiff:
Michael Hayden
Defendant:
Biomet Manufacturing, LLC, Biomet U.S. Reconstruction, LLC, Biomet, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Knopf v. Esposito
as 18-2193
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Knopf and Norma Knopf
Appellant:
Eric W. Berry
Defendant - Appellee:
Frank M. Esposito, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Nathaniel H. Akerman and others
Knopf v. Esposito
as 18-668
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Knopf and Norma Knopf
Appellant:
Eric W. Berry
Defendant - Appellee:
Frank M. Esposito, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Nathaniel H. Akerman and others
Knopf v. Phillips
as 18-661
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Norma Knopf and Michael Knopf
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael Phillips, Pursuit Holdings (NY), LLC, FKA Pursuit Holdings, LLC and Michael Hayden Sanford
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
