Cases 21 - 30 of 218
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, et al v. Gina Raimondo, et al
as 22-5267
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Matt Campbell, Diana Hetzel and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Barbara Krukowski-Rastelli and William Prevatel, AIA
Defendant / Appellee:
Gina Raimondo, in her official capacity as Secretary of Commerce, James Olthoff, Dr.; in his official capacity as Director of the National Institute for Standards and Technology, National Institute of Standards and Technology and others
HEARN v. USA
as 1:2022cv01344
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HENRY HEARN
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Rucker v. Hinds County Public Defender's Office et al
as 3:2022cv00483
Plaintiff:
Mario T. Rucker
Defendant:
Hinds County Public Defender's Office, Attorney Alison O. Kelly and Attorney Michael Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hearn v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2022cv00469
Plaintiff:
Michael Henry Hearn
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hearn v. MTC
as 3:2022cv00470
Plaintiff:
Michael Henry Hearn
Defendant:
MTC
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12821
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HENRY BROWN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RUDIN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11716
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HENRY RUDIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HENRY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00727
Petitioner:
MICHAEL HENRY
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Anderson v. Dayton
as 6:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Michael Henry Anderson
Defendant:
Ray J. Dayton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
