Cases 41 - 50 of 1,867
Nancy Lott v. Michael Astrue
as 13-1180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NANCY A. LOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security
Fratantion v. Astrue
as 1:2013cv00648
Plaintiff:
Maria Louise Fratantion
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Bailey v. Astrue
as 4:2013cv00014
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey R. Bailey
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hensley v. Astrue
as 2:2013cv00003
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Deborah Kate Hensley
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Tyson v. Colvin
as 8:2013cv00029
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue and Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Cheryl L. Tyson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Garza v. Astrue
as 5:2013cv00044
Defendant:
Cmr. Social Security Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Caroline Garza
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SCOTT v. ASTRUE
as 1:2013cv00091
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
TRENA N. SCOTT
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
McMilllian v. Astrue
as 7:2013cv00019
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Stephanie N McMillian
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Alvarado v. Astrue
as 3:2013cv00010
Plaintiff:
Jose Alfredo Alvarado
Defendant:
Cmr. Social Security Michael J. Astrue
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Kimble v. Astrue
as 1:2013cv00216
Plaintiff:
Melba Kimble
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
