Cases 11 - 20 of 58
James v. The City of Chattanooga, Tennessee et al
as 1:2021cv00137
Defendant:
Lance Hughes, The City of Chattanooga, Tennessee, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Michael James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Krusell v. Biden et al
as 1:2021cv00484
Plaintiff:
Michael James Krusell
Defendant:
Peter Wallin, Joe Biden, Thomas Zimmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv06359
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sullivan v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 2:2020cv00069
Plaintiff:
Michael James Sullivan
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Michael Nelson v. USA
as 20-1927
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL JAMES NELSON
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Michael Allen
as 20-1579
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL JAMES ALLEN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nelson v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv00221
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Michael James Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
O'Burke et al v. Hendersonville Hospital Corporation et al
as 3:2019cv01167
Plaintiff:
Randy O'Burke and Karen O'Burke
Defendant:
Clyde O. Southwell, M.D., Hendersonville Hospital Corporation, Jayesh A. Patel, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 dd Examination and treatment for emergency medical conditions and women in labor
USA v. Michael Carpenter
as 19-2314
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL JAMES CARPENTER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
James et al v. LR Vincent Truck and Service et al
as 2:2019cv00064
Defendant:
Edward D. Hedlund and LR Vincent Truck and Service
Plaintiff:
Michael Steven James, Adler Michael James and Angela Maria James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
