Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Keating v. Federal Express Corporation
as 5:2026cv02288
Plaintiff:
Michael Keating
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Oakmoor Pallet, LLC v. Stewart et al.
as 1:2025cv02747
Defendant:
Dyco Forest Products, LLC, William "Joey" Stewart and Dyco
Plaintiff:
Oakmoor Pallet, LLC
Counter-Claimant:
William "Joey" Stewart
Counter-Defendant:
Michael Keating and Oakmoor Pallet, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
National Fire & Marine Insurance Company v. Windy City Anesthesia, PC et al
as 1:2024cv01382
Plaintiff:
National Fire & Marine Insurance Company
Defendant:
Windy City Anesthesia, PC, Michael Turner and Michael Keating, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
B. v. County of Butte et al
as 1:2023at00786
Plaintiff:
M. B.
Defendant:
County of Butte, Stephanie Brazil, Sarah Cornett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
M.B. v. County of Butte et al
as 2:2023cv01977
Plaintiff:
M. B.
Defendant:
County of Butte, Stephanie Brazil, Sarah Cornett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Keating v. Dover Bay Specialty Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv02626
Plaintiff:
Michael Keating
Defendant:
Dover Bay Specialty Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
REARDON v. SIMON et al
as 1:2023cv03492
Plaintiff:
JOHN E. REARDON
Defendant:
JOHN/JANE DOE(S), SGT. A. L. SIMON, CHIEF LEASON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keating v. Miller
as 1:2021cv04065
Petitioner:
Michael Keating
Respondent:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keating v. Miller
as 1:2021cv05910
Petitioner:
Michael Keating
Respondent:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
