Cases 1 - 10 of 22
McCoy v. Westlake Financial Services
as 8:2023cv02376
Plaintiff:
Michael McCoy
Defendant:
Westlake Financial Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lavarn Watson v. Dougherty County Law Library, et al
as 22-11474
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAVARN C. WATSON
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUGHERTY COUNTY LAW LIBRARY, MICHAEL MCCOY, DOUGHERTY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR and others
WATSON v. DOUGHERTY COUNTY LAW LIBRARY et al
as 1:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
LAVARN C WATSON
Defendant:
DOUGHERTY COUNTY LAW LIBRARY, MICHAEL MCCOY, STEVEN CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCoy et al v. Gordils et al
as 1:2021cv04940
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCCOY, MATTHEW MCCOY and DONALD JESSE ANDRADE
Defendant:
P.O. JOEL GORDILS #8451, P.O. JOHN DOE, CITY OF CHICAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Peoria County, Illinois et al
as 1:2016cv01367
Plaintiff:
Jason Young
Defendant:
Peoria County, Illinois , Michael McCoy , Brian Asbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John McGee v. Kevin Lindsey, et al
as 15-2959
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John W. McGee
Defendant - Appellee:
Kevin D. Lindsey, Chief of Police, Fort Smith, Police Department, Detective Michael McCoy, Officer Josh Mixon and others
Thomas v. USA et al
as 2:2015cv00396
Plaintiff:
Jayaton-Kerry Edward Thomas
Defendant:
USA, CEO of USA, Dale A. Drozd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGee v. Lindsey et al
as 2:2014cv02230
Plaintiff:
John W. McGee
Defendant:
Kevin D. Lindsey , Michael McCoy , Josh Mixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00039
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
