Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Miller v. Jackson County Sheriff Department
as 2:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Michael Miller
Defendant:
Jackson County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. South Central Regional Jail
as 2:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
Michael Miller
Defendant:
South Central Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Davidson et al
as 1:2021cv00319
Plaintiff:
Rusty Anderson
Defendant:
Gene Davidson, 12 or More Grand Jurors, FNU Etters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Miller v. Jelena McWilliams
as 21-2073
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT M. MILLER and ROBERT MICHAEL MILLER
Defendant / Appellee:
JELENA MCWILLIAMS, Chairwoman and FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
Anderson v. Cleveland County Detention Center et al
as 1:2021cv00240
Petitioner:
Rusty Ryan Anderson
Respondent:
Cleveland County Detention Center, FNU Epters, Michael Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Miller Jr. v. Watts et al
as 1:2021cv01533
Defendant:
Lt. Murphy, Sgt. Paige, Ofc. Figueon and others
Plaintiff:
John Michael Miller Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Miller v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv01663
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Michael Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller, Jr. v. Officer Davis-5557 et al
as 1:2021cv01144
Plaintiff:
John Michael Miller, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer Becketts-5748, Officer Flaherty-4963 and Officer Davis-5557
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
US v. Adam Miller
as 20-4631
Defendant / Appellant:
ADAM MICHAEL MILLER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Miller et al v. Smith & Nephew , Inc.
as 1:2019cv02958
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Miller and Mary Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
