Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Trapani v. Sypniewski et al
as 8:2023cv01433
Plaintiff:
Damian R. Trapani
Defendant:
Matthew J. Sypniewski, Ronald Butler, Tracy Paratore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moe v. Apotex Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv11332
Plaintiff:
Michael Moe
Defendant:
Apotex Corporation, Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc., Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10849
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Thomas v. Town of Lloyd et al
as 1:2021cv01358
Plaintiff:
Alton Thomas
Defendant:
Town of Lloyd, Town of Lloyd Police Department, Town of Plattekill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Moe v. USA, et al
as 21-56027
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL MOE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TRACY L. WILKISON, Official Capacity and KRISTI KOONS JOHNSON, Official Capacity
Michael Moe v. United States of America et al
as 2:2021cv02990
Plaintiff:
Michael Moe
Defendant:
Kristy Koons Johnson, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Tracy L. Wilkison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv10172
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10103
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Paraflon Investments, Ltd. v. Fullbridge, Inc., et al
as 19-1913
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PARAFLON INVESTMENTS, LTD.
Defendant / Appellee:
FULLBRIDGE, INC., CANDICE OLSON and PETER OLSON
Defendant:
EDWARD J. MATHIAS, MICHAEL MOE and DAVID WONG
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv11939
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
