Cases 31 - 40 of 282
Quincy Patrick v. Kingston Police Department, et al
as 23-1348
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINCY MICHAEL PATRICK
Defendant / Appellee:
DET. RICHARD KOTCHIN, SCOTT L. RAVERT, JOHN B. and others
Defendant:
RICHARD KOTCHIN
HAYES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03345
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PATRICK HAYES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ray et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00402
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dewayne Scott, James Edward Ray, Timothy William Palivoda and others
Defendant:
Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, 3M Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Ray et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dewayne Scott, James Edward Rayford, Timothy William Palivoda and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
FOLEY v. SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC
as 1:2022cv03508
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PATRICK FOLEY
Defendant:
SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
HADLEY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18693
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PATRICK HADLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HALL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14483
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PATRICK HALL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WARREN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14876
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PATRICK WARREN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kennedy v. Lumpkin
as 22-50682
Petitioner / Appellant:
Michael Patrick Kennedy
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
USA v. Michael Hernandez
as 22-50167
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL PATRICK HERNANDEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
